Showing posts with label Bukit Sembawang. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bukit Sembawang. Show all posts

Bukit Sembawang Estates - Your Key To Buried Treasure

Thursday, September 17, 2009

Purest Play on S’pore Residential. Bukit Sembawang (“BS”) offers the purest play on the Singapore residential market, with nearly 100% of its RNAV attributed to this sub-sector. It has been associated with the development of landed housing in Singapore since the 1950s.

Low-Cost Legacy Land. BS holds 4.2mil sqft of landbank in Singapore, which places it second among listed developers. About 74% of this is low-cost legacy land from its days in the rubber plantation business, resulting in EBIT margins of 36% to 53%, which is higher than the usual 15- 20% EBIT margin associated with mass-market properties.

This legacy land is zoned for landed housing, a subsegment of the residential market that has demonstrated greater resilience in the recent cycle. An increased scarcity of landed sites bodes well for future pricing power and unlocking of value. In 2005-06, BS diversified into the nonlanded segment, acquiring c.1.4mil sqft of GFA in the mid and high-end segments, enabling it to tap into a recovery in these segments filtering up from the mass-market.

Initiate Coverage with a BUY, TP S$6.02. TP is based on a 30% discount to RNAV of S$8.60, to account for its low liquidity and expectation of a more gradual monetisation of its landbank. The stock is currently trading at 0.5x P/RNAV, the lowest in the sector, presenting undemanding valuations for value investors with a longer-term view.

Sponsored Links

Bukit Sembawang Estates - Verdure, Luxus yet to contribute

Thursday, August 20, 2009

1Q FY10 PATMI of S$1.4mn (-84% y-y, -102% q-q) meets 73% of our full-year forecast of S$1.9mn. The variance to our forecast is, in our view, principally on account of the treatment of property development-related other operating expenses and interest costs - 1Q FY10 other operating expenses of S$0.2mn and interest costs of S$0.7mn meet just 3% and 4% of our full-year forecasts. The firm has suspended the capitalisation of these expenses for deferred projects and we have taken this into account in our forecast – for instance, 1Q FY10 cash interest paid of S$4.67mn meets 25.9% of our FY10F interest expense forecast of S$18mn and is in line with our expectation, despite the P&L discrepancy.

While 1Q FY10 revenue of S$6.4mn (-72% y-y, +32% q-q) meets just 12% of our full-year forecast of S$54.3mn, we expect the sales of Verdure and Luxus Hills Phase 1 to be recognised in subsequent quarters this FY and help full-year numbers meet our forecast. In addition, we are likely to raise our forecast to reflect better-than-expected sales at the two projects. As at end-June, Verdure had 69 out of the total 75 units sold, vs the 62 units inputted in our model. In essence, only the six strata villas in the project remained unsold. We understand that Luxus Hills Phase 1, which was launched in July, already has 75 out of the total 78 units sold, vs the 70 units assumed in our model. Further, the achieved selling prices were apparently higher than our assumption of S$544psf of build-up area, at circa S$583-683psf.

While the management gave a conservative guidance (“management remains cautious during this expansionary period”), we think some projects could be brought forward to capitalise on the current window of opportunity. Potential candidates include cluster housing project Watercove Ville and Luxus Hills Phase 2, which could provide further upside to our estimates.

Bukit Sembawang Estates - Vermont pasture for bulls?

Monday, July 6, 2009

Following the successful launch of Verdure (FH, 75 units) — 64 out of the 75 units launched in April were sold at an average price of circa S$1,400psf — Bukit Sembawang (BS) could release the first phase of the landed housing project along Ang Mo Kio Avenue 5, named Luxus Hills (formerly “Lot 9425C Mk 18”; 999-year, 944 units in total, Phase 1 comprises 78 units) for sale next. We assume that these landed housing units will be priced at S$1.1-1.2mn each, more or less what new freehold terrace houses in Yio Chu Kang (Amanusa for instance) are transacting for in the secondary market.

Besides Luxus Hills Phase 1, BS has two other projects that are launch-ready — a prime luxury condominium project called Vermont at Cairnhill (freehold, 123 units) and a waterfront landed housing project called Watercove Ville in the northern part of Singapore, next to the Sembawang Park (freehold, 80 units). We had previously assumed that Watercove Ville would be launched for sale in the current financial year, together with Luxus Hills Phase 1, but the likelihood of deferral has increased, in our view. To begin with, we think the Straits of Johor frontage and the serenity of Sembawang Park will allow the project to fetch a bigger premium if it is launched after the current property downcycle, and BS has the balance sheet to push back the launch, following the recently concluded rights issue (in any case, the carrying cost of the site is also relatively low). Further, management’s cautious stance suggests a parallel launch of Luxus Hills Phase 1 and Watercove Ville this financial year is unlikely. In fact, because of the higher carrying cost of Vermont, we believe BS is looking for the opportunity to release Vermont for sale first.

We think Vermont is trickier. Next door, Vida (FH, 132 units) sold more units in April and May (project was 59% sold as at end-April) at more than S$2,000psf (with a twoyear yield guarantee). However, Vida’s units are all small ones, comprising entirely one- and two-bedroom units that start from 517 sq ft. This means that while the psf price is high, the average purchase quantum of slightly over S$1mn is still low enough to entice buyers to take up units in the current market.

Vermont, on the other hand, is made up of larger units — about 1,600-1,700 sq ft each on average — and as such, it may be unrealistic to expect Vermont to be priced similarly to Vida on a psf basis. The other new project in the vicinity, Hilltops (freehold, 241 units), has large units (about 1,800-1,900 sq ft each on average) but the project was only 12% sold at near S$4,000psf during the peak of cycle and, unsurprisingly, there have been no secondary transactions since. In short, what is tricky about Vermont for BS is that the price discovery process for the project may not be a clearcut one. That said, on the flip side, one can perhaps then argue that if and when BS decides to proceed with the launch of Vermont, it can be viewed as a bullish sign in the sense that the price discovery process for large units in prime locations has been completed from the perspective of the management, which we believe has hitherto been inclined towards the cautious side of things.

BS’s 4Q FY09 (year-end March) results confirmed our belief that the site in question for a potential provision for foreseeable losses to be made, was Fairways. The S$70mn provision made brought the effective land cost of the freehold site in Telok Blangah from the original S$255.1mn (or S$785psfppr) to S$185.1mn (or S$570psfppr). We think the move was prudent on BS’s part and increased its chance to tap the mass- to middle market condo market, especially taking into account the apparently smaller units of the proposed development. Based on existing plans, a 270-unit condo will be built on a GFA of 325,000 sq ft (or circa 1,200 sq ft each unit on average). Still, the risk of further provision remains, in our view. To put things in perspective, units at next door Harbour View Towers (99-year, completed in 1994) are transacting at some S$700psf in the secondary market. Even allowing for a longer land tenure and newer development, the margin implied by the adjusted land cost of S$570psf appears thin, especially if construction costs trend higher.

Our valuation methodology of pegging the 12-month price target to the distressed NAV estimate remains unchanged for highly leveraged smaller property developers like BS. We had, however, valued Luxus Hills Phase 1, Vermont and Watercove Ville on an estimated land value basis previously. Considering the group’s more prudent capital structure following the recently concluded rights issue, we think BS has the ability to deliver the three projects to the market within our forecast period. As such, we now value the three projects on a completion basis, pricing them at our projected trough valuation. In addition, we have raised the estimated land costs for the remaining phases of Luxus Hills, Lot 12949A Phases 1 and 2, Lot 9934W as well as Fairways by 5% to reflect a less bearish stance on the mass market segment. Consequently, our distressed NAV estimate and price target is raised from S$2.76 to S$3.43 (+24.3%).

Bukit Sembawang Estates (S$3.59) - Focus on inherent value again

Friday, June 12, 2009

The successful launch of The Verdure has given us optimism that management is finally taken steps to realise the inherent value of its inventory. BukitSemb has 5m sf of low-cost landbank. Balance sheet and cash flow are set to improve significantly after its rights issue and successful new launches. The stock has been a laggard in this rally vs. purer residential developers, trading below its historical P/BV of 1.5x. We lower our FY10-11 core EPS estimates by 32-86% on the back of deferred earnings from Paterson Suites, Fairways Condo and St. Thomas Walk as we expect these projects to enter the market later. We also roll forward our RNAV to CY10 and lower our RNAV estimate from S$6.45 to S$5.54, after factoring in dilution from the rights issue as well as higher ASP assumptions. In addition, we reduce our RNAV discount from 40% to 25% to reflect mid-cycle valuations. All in all, our target price rises from S$3.87 to S$4.15. With a considerable low-cost landbank and exposure to the resilient upgraders' market, we believe BukitSemb will benefit from the ongoing volume spurt in the physical market. Upgrade from Underperform to Outperform.

Disclaimers

These articles are neither an offer nor the solicitation of an offer to sell or purchase any investment. Its contents are based on information obtained from sources believed to be reliable and we make no representation and accepts no responsibility or liability as to its completeness or accuracy. We share them here as they are very informative, we claim no rights to these articles. If you own these articles, and do not wish to share it here, please do inform us by putting a comment and we will remove them immediately. We do not have any intentions to infringe any copyrights of yours. This is a place to keep record on the analyst recommendation for our own future references. We hope this serves as a record in the future, also make them searchable. We bear no responsibility for any profit, loss generated from these reports.
 
Citrus Pink Blogger Theme Design By LawnyDesignz Powered by Blogger