Plife rating lowered

Tuesday, June 16, 2009

Fitch has lowered its rating for Plife’s “Long Term Issuer’s Default” and its $500 mln multi-currency “Medium Term Note Program”, by one notch to BBB from BBB+ , despite the latter’s healthy financials: gearing of 23% at end Mar ’09 vs MAS’ 60% guideline.

The downgrade is likely because of Plife’s sponsor Parkway Holdings’ massive hospital / medical centre project in Novena. Note the tender was secured in mid February ’08, at land cost of $1.246 bln, and development costs estimated at $300-500 mln.

(Note also the persistent concern over Plife’s “single customer exposure”, given its heavy dependence on lease income from the 3 Singapore hospitals, which are managed by Parkway Holdings: Mount Elizabeth , Gleneagles , and EastShore . Parkway Holdings owns 35.6% of PLife.)

Note that Parkway Holdings had on 31/3/08 announced a 7-for-15 rights issue at $2.18 to raise $760 mln to part finance the Novena acquisition. (30% of the 779,000 sf gross floor area is intended for medical suites, 36% for in-patient beds, 20% for diagnostic services , and the balance for retail & ancillary services.)

However, Parkway’s gearing remains high: at end Mar ’09, borrowings totaled $1,220.63 mln against shareholders funds of $1,370.68 mln. Cash amounted to $553.64 mln.

Any knee-jerk reaction, to say below 90 cents, would be an opportunity to buy more PLife units. BBB is still investment grade, albeit borderline case. At 95¢, annualised yield based on Q1 ‘09 payout is 8%.

Sponsored Links

Related Posts by Categories



Comments

No response to “Plife rating lowered”
Post a Comment | Post Comments (Atom)

Post a Comment

Disclaimers

These articles are neither an offer nor the solicitation of an offer to sell or purchase any investment. Its contents are based on information obtained from sources believed to be reliable and we make no representation and accepts no responsibility or liability as to its completeness or accuracy. We share them here as they are very informative, we claim no rights to these articles. If you own these articles, and do not wish to share it here, please do inform us by putting a comment and we will remove them immediately. We do not have any intentions to infringe any copyrights of yours. This is a place to keep record on the analyst recommendation for our own future references. We hope this serves as a record in the future, also make them searchable. We bear no responsibility for any profit, loss generated from these reports.
 
Citrus Pink Blogger Theme Design By LawnyDesignz Powered by Blogger